Knickerbocker v. Candee
172 A.D. 931, 156 N.Y.S. 1129
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 172 A.D. 931 (Knickerbocker v. Candee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Knickerbocker v. Candee, 172 A.D. 931, 156 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Assuming that the referee has sufficient standing to appeal from the judgment so far as it relates to his fees, we are of the opinion that the Special Term correctly decided that the limitation of $500 contained in section 3297 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies to actions of partition. Judgment affirmed, without costs. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schorner v. Schorner
128 Misc. 2d 415 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 931, 156 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knickerbocker-v-candee-nyappdiv-1916.