Knickerbocker Steel Warehouse Corp. v. Salter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knickerbocker Steel Warehouse Corp. v. Salter

283 A.D. 711, 128 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5034

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 711 (Knickerbocker Steel Warehouse Corp. v. Salter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knickerbocker Steel Warehouse Corp. v. Salter, 283 A.D. 711, 128 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendants-appellants, and the warrant of attachment vacated as to the appellants Julius B. Salter and Julius B. Salter, Inc., it appearing that the individual defendant is a resident of the State and the defendant corporation is a domestic corporation. The warrant of attachment is not disturbed as to the defendant Utitee, S. A., which has not appealed. The [712]*712return on the attachment showed that the property belonged to Ufitec. If the appellants claim that the property belongs to them, they may seek its release in the usual proceeding involving a claim of ownership. As appellants have been personally served in the jurisdiction, jurisdiction over them personally has been obtained. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendants-appellants, and the warrant of attachment vacated as to the appellants Julius B. Salter and Julius B. Salter, Inc., it appearing that the individual defendant is a resident of the State and the defendant corporation is a domestic corporation. The warrant of attachment is not disturbed as to the defendant Utitee, S. A., which has not appealed. The [712]*712return on the attachment showed that the property belonged to Ufitec. If the appellants claim that the property belongs to them, they may seek its release in the usual proceeding involving a claim of ownership. As appellants have been personally served in the jurisdiction, jurisdiction over them personally has been obtained. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 711, 128 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knickerbocker-steel-warehouse-corp-v-salter-nyappdiv-1954.