Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. v. Cullen

Second Circuit

Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. v. Cullen

49 F. 166, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1111

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 49 F. 166 (Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. v. Cullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. v. Cullen, 49 F. 166, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1111 (2d Cir. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are satisfied that the towage service, for the recovery of which this' libel is filed, was not rendered on the credit of the schooner or her owners, but both her master and the libelant understood that the towage was to be collected of the Ridgewood Ice Company, the charterer of the vessel. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs of this court, and the cause remanded to that court, with directions to render a decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are satisfied that the towage service, for the recovery of which this' libel is filed, was not rendered on the credit of the schooner or her owners, but both her master and the libelant understood that the towage was to be collected of the Ridgewood Ice Company, the charterer of the vessel. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs of this court, and the cause remanded to that court, with directions to render a decree accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 F. 166, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knickerbocker-steam-towage-co-v-cullen-ca2-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack