Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. v. Cullen

Second Circuit

Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. v. Cullen

49 F. 166, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1111

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 7, 1891·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are satisfied that the towage service, for the recovery of which this' libel is filed, was not rendered on the credit of the schooner or her owners, but both her master and the libelant understood that the towage was to be collected of the Ridgewood Ice Company, the charterer of the vessel. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs of this court, and the cause remanded to that court, with directions to render a decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are satisfied that the towage service, for the recovery of which this' libel is filed, was not rendered on the credit of the schooner or her owners, but both her master and the libelant understood that the towage was to be collected of the Ridgewood Ice Company, the charterer of the vessel. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs of this court, and the cause remanded to that court, with directions to render a decree accordingly.

Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. v. Cullen, 49 F. 166, 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1111 (2d Cir. 1891).

Pincite

49 F. 166 (Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co. v. Cullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related