Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Theiss
22 Misc. 767, 49 N.Y.S. 1139
This text of 22 Misc. 767 (Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Theiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Theiss, 22 Misc. 767, 49 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).
Opinion
The jury, upon the evidence submitted, was certainly justified in finding that John Henry Theiss and his brother G eorge composed the firm of G. Theiss & Brother, at the time of the transaction in question, and, therefore, the judgment herein must be affirmed, with costs.
Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., Oonlan and Schuohman, JJ
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 Misc. 767, 49 N.Y.S. 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knickerbocker-ice-co-v-theiss-nynyccityct-1898.