Kneller, D. v. Stewart, M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kneller, D. v. Stewart, M.

118 A.3d 1106, 632 Pa. 173, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1458

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 8, 2015

Docket63 MM 2015

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 A.3d 1106 (Kneller, D. v. Stewart, M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kneller, D. v. Stewart, M., 118 A.3d 1106, 632 Pa. 173, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1458 (Pa. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2015, as Petitioner may pursue redress in a civil action, mandamus relief is not available. See Relosky v. Sacco, 514 Pa. 339, 523 A.2d 1112 (1987) (holding that a petitioner may not obtain mandamus relief unless he establishes the absence of another adequate reme *174 dy). As such, the Petition for Review in the Nature of Mandamus is DENIED, and the Application to Disqualify Counsel is DISMISSED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2015, as Petitioner may pursue redress in a civil action, mandamus relief is not available. See Relosky v. Sacco, 514 Pa. 339, 523 A.2d 1112 (1987) (holding that a petitioner may not obtain mandamus relief unless he establishes the absence of another adequate reme *174 dy). As such, the Petition for Review in the Nature of Mandamus is DENIED, and the Application to Disqualify Counsel is DISMISSED as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A.3d 1106, 632 Pa. 173, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kneller-d-v-stewart-m-pa-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack