Kneiss v. Sheehan Memorial Hospital

242 A.D.2d 930, 665 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10516

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We add only that defendant’s contention that the court erred in failing to poll the jury is not preserved for our review (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [3]; Enderby v Keppler, 184 AD2d 1058), and we reject defendant’s contention that a new trial on liability is required because of the court’s errors. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J.—New Trial.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kneiss v. Sheehan Memorial Hospital, 242 A.D.2d 930, 665 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

242 A.D.2d 930 (Kneiss v. Sheehan Memorial Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Enderby v. Keppler
184 A.D.2d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)