Kneip v. McWilliams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kneip v. McWilliams

71 A.D.3d 895, 895 N.Y.S.2d 830

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 71 A.D.3d 895 (Kneip v. McWilliams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kneip v. McWilliams, 71 A.D.3d 895, 895 N.Y.S.2d 830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court article 6 in which the father petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Duffy, J.), entered April 3, 2009.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The father concedes that his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed. On appeal, the father only challenges the Family Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed, as findings of fact and conclusions of law are not separately appealable (see Lester & Assoc., P.C. v Eneman, 69 AD 3d 906 [2010]; Meachum v Outdoor World Corp., 273 AD2d 208 [2000]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court article 6 in which the father petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Duffy, J.), entered April 3, 2009.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The father concedes that his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed. On appeal, the father only challenges the Family Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed, as findings of fact and conclusions of law are not separately appealable (see Lester & Assoc., P.C. v Eneman, 69 AD 3d 906 [2010]; Meachum v Outdoor World Corp., 273 AD2d 208 [2000]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.3d 895, 895 N.Y.S.2d 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kneip-v-mcwilliams-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack