Kneifle v. State
This text of 13 Wis. 369 (Kneifle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Cowrt,
This case was before the court on writ of error to the circuit court of Juneau county. The [370]*370plaintiff in error was indicted, with five others, in the circuit court of La Crosse county, for tbe murder of one "William Dennison. He made application for a change of venue, and the cause was sent to Janeau county for trial. On the trial in the circuit court in that county, the jury found him guilty of manslaughter in the second degree. The court therefore sentenced him to confinement at hard labor in the state prison for seven years, the first day in each month during the confinement to be solitary imprisonment. No objection is taken to the form or sufficiency of the indictment. Neither do we perceive any error in the verdict or judgment of the court. It is now alleged that the circuit court of La Crosse county first improperly refused to change the venue on application being made therefor by the plaintiff in error, and that when the venue was changed it was improperly changed as to the defendants who made no application for such change. It is further alleged, that the circuit court of Juneau county committed various errors upon the trial, and gave improper instructions to the jury. But there is an insuperable difficulty to our considering these various objections, which is, that there is no bill of exceptions in the case, and these questions are not therefore before us. "We can only consider matters and errors apparent upon the record. The indictment charges the offense in apt and proper words, and the verdict and judgment axe legal and sufficient. If any errors occurred on the trial, exceptions should have been taken, and a bill of exceptions prepared embracing those matters, so that this court could review them. We must therefore affirm the judgment.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Wis. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kneifle-v-state-wis-1861.