Knecht v. New York City Ry. Co.

98 N.Y.S. 1106
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 24, 1906
StatusPublished

This text of 98 N.Y.S. 1106 (Knecht v. New York City Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knecht v. New York City Ry. Co., 98 N.Y.S. 1106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant concedes its liability, but questions the amount awarded as damages. Plaintiff’s injuries were very slight, and the damages seem to be unreasonably large. There is reason to believe that the jury may have been influenced by the persistent efforts to bring to their attention the unfortunate results suffered by other persons by reason of the same accident. The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment to $200.50, in which case the judgment, as modified, will be affirmed, without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 N.Y.S. 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knecht-v-new-york-city-ry-co-nyappterm-1906.