Knaus Systems, Inc. v. Aye

757 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5221, 2000 WL 552516
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 2000·No. No. 1D00-911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We construe the circuit court’s order being appealed herein as entering, summary judgment solely in favor of defendants Thompson and Berger & Davis, P.A. In light of the continued pendency of the compulsory counterclaim pled by those defendants, the subject order is not presently appealable. See Taussig v. Insurance Co. of North America, 301 So.2d 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek review upon entry of a final and appealable order.

MINER, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knaus Systems, Inc. v. Aye, 757 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5221, 2000 WL 552516 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

757 So. 2d 582 (Knaus Systems, Inc. v. Aye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. RIVER RANCH CATTLE COMPANY, LLC
36 So. 3d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)