Knaup v. Horace Harding Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knaup v. Horace Harding Hospital

1 A.D.2d 849, 150 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6195

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 849 (Knaup v. Horace Harding Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knaup v. Horace Harding Hospital, 1 A.D.2d 849, 150 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order denying a motion to consolidate an action by a hospital against a patient’s husband and another to recover for services rendered to the patient with an action by the patient against the hospital and three physicians to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her during the performance of a Surgical operation, and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services. In the latter action, neither the complaint nor the bill of particulars states facts which constitute a sufficient showing of a cause of action against the hospital for any wrong committed in connection with the rendition of its services. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order denying a motion to consolidate an action by a hospital against a patient’s husband and another to recover for services rendered to the patient with an action by the patient against the hospital and three physicians to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her during the performance of a Surgical operation, and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services. In the latter action, neither the complaint nor the bill of particulars states facts which constitute a sufficient showing of a cause of action against the hospital for any wrong committed in connection with the rendition of its services. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 849, 150 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knaup-v-horace-harding-hospital-nyappdiv-1956.