Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank

292 U.S. 599, 54 S. Ct. 632
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 2, 1934·No. No. 863·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions of the appellees to dis[600] miss the appeal herein are granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a. substantial federal question. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U.S. 445, 448, 449; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U.S. 444, 451; Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U.S. 169, 172.

Mr. Meyer Abrams for appellants. Messrs. Silas H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, Harold A. Smith, James C. Condon, Thos. D. Nash, and Michael J. Ahern for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank, 292 U.S. 599, 54 S. Ct. 632 (1934).

292 U.S. 599 (Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan
263 U.S. 444 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer
265 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Hicklin v. Coney
290 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1933)