Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank

292 U.S. 599, 54 S. Ct. 632
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 2, 1934
DocketNo. 863
StatusPublished

This text of 292 U.S. 599 (Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank, 292 U.S. 599, 54 S. Ct. 632 (1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions of the appellees to dis[600]*600miss the appeal herein are granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a. substantial federal question. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U.S. 445, 448, 449; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U.S. 444, 451; Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U.S. 169, 172.

Mr. Meyer Abrams for appellants. Messrs. Silas H. Strawn, Ralph M. Shaw, Harold A. Smith, James C. Condon, Thos. D. Nash, and Michael J. Ahern for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan
263 U.S. 444 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer
265 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Hicklin v. Coney
290 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 U.S. 599, 54 S. Ct. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knass-v-madison-kedzie-state-bank-scotus-1934.