Knash v. Compagnie Générale Transatlantique

Fifth Circuit

Knash v. Compagnie Générale Transatlantique

223 F. 326, 138 C.C.A. 588, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1719

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 5, 1915·No. No. 2625·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the evidence in the transcript, we concur with the trial court in finding that there was not sufficient proof that the injury resulting in the death of Joseph Knash occurred as alleged, nor of such negligence on the part of the shipown,ers as to render them responsible, and therefore, and for the other reasons given by Judge Foster, the decree appealed from is affirmed.

MAXEY, District Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the evidence in the transcript, we concur with the trial court in finding that there was not sufficient proof that the injury resulting in the death of Joseph Knash occurred as alleged, nor of such negligence on the part of the shipown,ers as to render them responsible, and therefore, and for the other reasons given by Judge Foster, the decree appealed from is affirmed.

MAXEY, District Judge, dissents.

Knash v. Compagnie Générale Transatlantique, 223 F. 326, 138 C.C.A. 588, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1719 (5th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

223 F. 326 (Knash v. Compagnie Générale Transatlantique) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.