Knapper v. Hibernia National Bank

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Knapper v. Hibernia National Bank

930 So. 2d 961, 2006 La. LEXIS 2104, 2006 WL 1735309

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 23, 2006

DocketNo. 2006-CC-1477

StatusPublished

This text of 930 So. 2d 961 (Knapper v. Hibernia National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knapper v. Hibernia National Bank, 930 So. 2d 961, 2006 La. LEXIS 2104, 2006 WL 1735309 (La. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Hibernia National Bank et al.; Hibernia Corporation; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. A, No. 2002-12170; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2006-C-0639.

Granted. Relator’s notice of intent was filed within thirty days of the trial court’s written judgment. See Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Although the trial court set the return date more than thirty days from the date of the [962]*962ruling, the trial court has authority under Rule 4-3 to extend the deadline for filing the application. Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hibernia National Bank et al.; Hibernia Corporation; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. A, No. 2002-12170; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2006-C-0639.

Granted. Relator’s notice of intent was filed within thirty days of the trial court’s written judgment. See Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Although the trial court set the return date more than thirty days from the date of the [962]*962ruling, the trial court has authority under Rule 4-3 to extend the deadline for filing the application. Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

930 So. 2d 961, 2006 La. LEXIS 2104, 2006 WL 1735309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knapper-v-hibernia-national-bank-la-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack