Knapp v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

643 So. 2d 127, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9990, 1994 WL 568097
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1994·No. No. 93-2934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the decision of the UAC. Its order rejected the referee’s finding of fact to the effect that claimant’s supervisor had instructed him to assist residents by lifting heavy packages for them. There was testimony in the record that, if believed by the referee, was sufficient to establish the fact in issue.

Although an agency may reject a hearing officer’s finding of fact after it has read the entire record, the record must disclose the complete absence of evidence to support the factual finding. Schumacher v. Dep’t of Professional Regulation, 611 So.2d 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The mere fact that UAC read the record in this case did not authorize the agency to disagree with a referee’s credibility detennination. Id.

REVERSED.

GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knapp v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 643 So. 2d 127, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9990, 1994 WL 568097 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

643 So. 2d 127 (Knapp v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Viering v. Florida Commission on Human Relations ex rel. Watson
128 So. 3d 967 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)