Knapp v. State
176 N.W. 960, 171 Wis. 202, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 95
Opinion
Plaintiff in error was convicted of bastardy and sued out a writ of error. His sole contention is that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. An examination of the record satisfies us that the judgment is supported by the evidence and should not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knapp v. State, 176 N.W. 960, 171 Wis. 202, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 95 (Wis. 1920).
176 N.W. 960 (Knapp v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
251 S.W. 612 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Integrity Mutual Casualty Co. v. Nelson
183 N.W. 837 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1921)