Knapp v. State
176 N.W. 960, 171 Wis. 202, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 95
This text of 176 N.W. 960 (Knapp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Knapp v. State, 176 N.W. 960, 171 Wis. 202, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 95 (Wis. 1920).
Opinion
Plaintiff in error was convicted of bastardy and sued out a writ of error. His sole contention is that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. An examination of the record satisfies us that the judgment is supported by the evidence and should not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
251 S.W. 612 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Integrity Mutual Casualty Co. v. Nelson
183 N.W. 837 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 N.W. 960, 171 Wis. 202, 1920 Wisc. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knapp-v-state-wis-1920.