Knapp v. State
This text of 575 P.2d 601 (Knapp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Knapp was convicted of conspiring to commit grand larceny. He was sentenced to serve one year in the county jail. Imposition of sentence was suspended and he was placed on probation. One condition of probation was that he serve the first 70 days in the county jail. He did so. Later, his probation was revoked and the original one-year sentence imposed. This appeal is from the order of revocation.
The main claim of error is that the district court should have given 70 days credit against the sentence to be served.1 Knapp [111]*111was convicted of a gross misdemeanor which carries a maximum jail sentence of one year. NRS 193.140. The effect of denying credit was to impose a sentence in excess of that authorized by statute. This was error. We remand with direction to modify the sentence to give credit for time served as a condition of probation.2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
575 P.2d 601, 94 Nev. 110, 1978 Nev. LEXIS 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knapp-v-state-nev-1978.