Knapp v. State
This text of 370 So. 2d 38 (Knapp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was arrested and charged with violating two conditions of his probation. After a hearing the trial court revoked the probation and sentenced appellant to five years in the state prison.
Appellant urges reversal on the grounds that there was a violation of his due process rights in connection with his probation violation hearing. It is appellant’s contention that he was not given proper and adequate notice of the hearing and that the court erred in denying his motion for a continuance thereby depriving appellant of an opportunity to produce witnesses and otherwise prepare a defense to the charges. We find merit in appellant’s contention and reverse.
Reversed. Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973); Mato v. State, 278 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Hines v. State, 358 So.2d 183 (Fla.1978).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
370 So. 2d 38, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knapp-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.