Knapp v. Perry

Michigan Supreme Court

Knapp v. Perry

75 N.W. 1135, 117 Mich. 97, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 796

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 17, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 N.W. 1135 (Knapp v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knapp v. Perry, 75 N.W. 1135, 117 Mich. 97, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 796 (Mich. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complainant filed the bill in this cause to reform a deed and mortgage. Upon the hearing, the relief prayed was denied; but the decree granted an extension of time within which she might redeem from the sale of the premises upon foreclosure of said mortgage. A petition for leave to file a bill of review was filed, and the complainant has appealed from a denial of the same. In our opinion, the action of the learned circuit judge is justified by the record, and it is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The complainant filed the bill in this cause to reform a deed and mortgage. Upon the hearing, the relief prayed was denied; but the decree granted an extension of time within which she might redeem from the sale of the premises upon foreclosure of said mortgage. A petition for leave to file a bill of review was filed, and the complainant has appealed from a denial of the same. In our opinion, the action of the learned circuit judge is justified by the record, and it is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 N.W. 1135, 117 Mich. 97, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knapp-v-perry-mich-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack