Knapp v. Onderdonk
2 Cai. Cas. 383, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 426
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 383 (Knapp v. Onderdonk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Knapp v. Onderdonk, 2 Cai. Cas. 383, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 426 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
Opinion
There is an evident laches. If the amendment is necessary, it ought to have been applied for before noticed for argument. The plaintiff in error must have known what was necessary to support his own assignment.
Amendment denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 383, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knapp-v-onderdonk-nysupct-1805.