Knapp v. Moseley

Mississippi Supreme Court

Knapp v. Moseley

102 So. 2d 185, 233 Miss. 341, 1958 Miss. LEXIS 388

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1958·No. No. 40770·Published

Opinion

Lee, J.

The pleadings in this cause necessitated a determination of the effect and extent of the work contract, both oral and written; and whether the job was performed in good workmanship style. The evidence, pro and con, was [342]*342in sharp dispute. The determination of such a controversy was strictly for the jury, and they were fully warranted in the verdict which they reached.

The points, which the appellants assigned and argued as errors, have either been settled adversely to their contentions, or they do not possess sufficient merit to require a discussion.

Affirmed.

Roberds, P. Jand Hall, Holmes and Ethridge, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee, J.

The pleadings in this cause necessitated a determination of the effect and extent of the work contract, both oral and written; and whether the job was performed in good workmanship style. The evidence, pro and con, was [342]*342in sharp dispute. The determination of such a controversy was strictly for the jury, and they were fully warranted in the verdict which they reached.

The points, which the appellants assigned and argued as errors, have either been settled adversely to their contentions, or they do not possess sufficient merit to require a discussion.

Affirmed.

Roberds, P. Jand Hall, Holmes and Ethridge, JJ., concur.

Knapp v. Moseley, 102 So. 2d 185, 233 Miss. 341, 1958 Miss. LEXIS 388 (Mich. 1958).

Pincite

102 So. 2d 185 (Knapp v. Moseley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.