Knapp v. Knapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knapp v. Knapp

259 A.D.2d 737, 685 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3201

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 1999·Published

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 11, 1995, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated March 17, 1998, which denied his motion, denominated as one to vacate an order of the same court entered May 28, 1996, but which was, in effect, for leave to reargue the plaintiffs prior motion.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue (see, Paulus v Kuchler, 214 AD2d 608; Huttner v McDaid, 151 AD2d 547). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 11, 1995, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated March 17, 1998, which denied his motion, denominated as one to vacate an order of the same court entered May 28, 1996, but which was, in effect, for leave to reargue the plaintiffs prior motion.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue (see, Paulus v Kuchler, 214 AD2d 608; Huttner v McDaid, 151 AD2d 547). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Knapp v. Knapp, 259 A.D.2d 737, 685 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

259 A.D.2d 737 (Knapp v. Knapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related