Knapp v. Knapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knapp v. Knapp

259 A.D.2d 737, 685 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3201

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 737 (Knapp v. Knapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knapp v. Knapp, 259 A.D.2d 737, 685 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 11, 1995, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated March 17, 1998, which denied his motion, denominated as one to vacate an order of the same court entered May 28, 1996, but which was, in effect, for leave to reargue the plaintiffs prior motion.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue (see, Paulus v Kuchler, 214 AD2d 608; Huttner v McDaid, 151 AD2d 547). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 11, 1995, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated March 17, 1998, which denied his motion, denominated as one to vacate an order of the same court entered May 28, 1996, but which was, in effect, for leave to reargue the plaintiffs prior motion.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue (see, Paulus v Kuchler, 214 AD2d 608; Huttner v McDaid, 151 AD2d 547). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 737, 685 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knapp-v-knapp-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack