Knapp v. King County

46 P. 1047, 15 Wash. 541, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 245
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 16, 1896
DocketNo 2389
StatusPublished

This text of 46 P. 1047 (Knapp v. King County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knapp v. King County, 46 P. 1047, 15 Wash. 541, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 245 (Wash. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From an order of the board of equalization of King County, denying the respondent’s petition for a reduction of his assessment, he appealed to the.superior court for that comity and the appellant having appeared therein specially and objected to the jurisdiction of that court to entertain said appeal, its objections were overruled and a judgment was entered, from which it has appealed.

An appeal does not lie from a board of equalization to the superior court. Olympia Water Works v. Thurston County, 14 Wash. 268 (44 Pac. 267); Buchanan v. Adams County, post.

The judgment will he reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the superior court to dismiss the proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olympia Water Works v. Thurston County
44 P. 267 (Washington Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 P. 1047, 15 Wash. 541, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knapp-v-king-county-wash-1896.