Knapp v. Dagg

18 How. Pr. 165
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Balcqm, Justice,

said : The plaintiff is not chargeable with the negligence of the driver of the team after which she rode. She could have sued him for the injury she has sustained. The defendant is guilty of injuring her as well as he is. [166] They have severally wronged her. She might sue either. She has chosen to bring her action against the defendant. The motion for a non-suit must be denied.

The plaintiff had a verdict for $50 damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knapp v. Dagg, 18 How. Pr. 165 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1857).

18 How. Pr. 165 (Knapp v. Dagg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prideaux v. City of Mineral Point
43 Wis. 513 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1878)
Lannen v. Albany Gas Light Co.
46 Barb. 264 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)
Davenport v. Ruckman
16 Abb. Pr. 341 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1862)