Knapp, Stout & Co. v. National Mut. Fire Ins.

30 F. 607, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2488
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri·Decided April 21, 1887·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Brewer, J.,

(orally.) In these cases a default is asked. The petition alleges that the defendant is a foreign insurance corporation, doing business in this state, having agents and offices located here. Service was made upon the insurance commissioner. He declined to receive the summons and copy of the petition that was handed him, no reason being given therefor. The service was good, if he had power to receive the service. The law of Missouri forbids any foreign insurance company doing business until it has filed with the insurance commissioner .a certificate stipulating that service upon him shall be personal service upon the company. As it is alleged in the petition that the company was doing business in this state, having agents and offices here, we are to presume that it has complied with the law; and therefore, prima facie, at least, the service is good, and default will be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knapp, Stout & Co. v. National Mut. Fire Ins., 30 F. 607, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2488 (circtedmo 1887).

30 F. 607 (Knapp, Stout & Co. v. National Mut. Fire Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Railway Express Co. v. Fleishman, Morris & Co.
141 S.E. 253 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1928)
State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Grimm
143 S.W. 483 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1912)
Corbett v. Physicians' Casualty Ass'n of America
115 N.W. 365 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
Old Wayne Mutual Life Ass'n v. McDonough
73 N.E. 703 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1905)
Modern Woodmen of America v. Noyes
64 N.E. 21 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)
Foster v. Charles Betcher Lumber Co.
23 L.R.A. 490 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)