Knap v. Sacket

1 Root 501
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 15, 1793
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 501 (Knap v. Sacket) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knap v. Sacket, 1 Root 501 (Colo. 1793).

Opinion

Underhill of New! York, owned the vessel; the plaintiff claimed her by virtue of a bill of sale from Close, captain of the vessel and agent for said Underhill; the defendant set up title to her in virtue of a purchase from said Under-hill, subsequent to the bill of sale from Close — whose power of agency and right to sell was drawn in question. And the defendant moved that Close might be sworn as a witness; but by the court was not admitted, for after he has executed a bill of sale in the name of Underhill, it shall not lie in his power to swear that he had no right to do it.

[502]*502The defendant offered a hill of sale of said vessel, witnessed by two subscribing witnesses — which was denied to be genuine. The defendant offered to prove the execution by comparison of the handwriting — hut by the court, it will not do to admit the lowest hind of evidence to authenticate a deed, when it is apparent that the party has better evidence in his power, which might have been produced. The hill of sale was rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knap-v-sacket-conn-1793.