Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kmed v. State

Kmed v. State

242 So. 3d 1074
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 2018·No. CASE NO.: 2D17–4174·Published

Opinion

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA2001).

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kmed v. State, 242 So. 3d 1074 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

242 So. 3d 1074 (Kmed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Al-Hakim v. State
783 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)