KMB Law Firm, P.A. v. Morsch

200 So. 3d 77, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5193, 2015 WL 1609935
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 2015
DocketNo. 5D14-2629
StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 3d 77 (KMB Law Firm, P.A. v. Morsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
KMB Law Firm, P.A. v. Morsch, 200 So. 3d 77, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5193, 2015 WL 1609935 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.1 See Soterakis v. Soterakis, 913 So.2d 688, 690 (Fla. 5th DCA [78]*782005) (“In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, an order that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed.” (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979))).

PALMER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Soterakis v. Soterakis
913 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 So. 3d 77, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5193, 2015 WL 1609935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kmb-law-firm-pa-v-morsch-fladistctapp-2015.