KM v. Department of Children and Families

42 So. 3d 345, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12536, 2010 WL 3359415
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 2010·No. 5D09-2726·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

K.M., the mother of L.B., appeals an order terminating her parental rights. 1 K.M. is proceeding pro se. 2 We have carefully considered K.M.’s arguments and thoroughly reviewed the record. Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm the order on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON, and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
1

. The father's parental rights were terminated in the same order. The father had tendered and the trial court accepted his surrender of all parental rights to L.B.

2

. The mother proceeds pro se because her court-appointed attorney withdrew on the ground that a thorough, conscientious, and good faith review showed no meritorious grounds on which to base an appeal, citing N.S.H. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., 843 So.2d 898 (Fla.2003). Otherwise, the mother at all times was represented by court-appointed counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KM v. Department of Children and Families, 42 So. 3d 345, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12536, 2010 WL 3359415 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

42 So. 3d 345 (KM v. Department of Children and Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

N.S.H. v. Florida Department of Children & Family Services
843 So. 2d 898 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)