Klussman v. Copeland

18 Ind. 306
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1862
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ind. 306 (Klussman v. Copeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klussman v. Copeland, 18 Ind. 306 (Ind. 1862).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question in this case is,, whether the heirs or representatives, or both, of a deceased maker of a [307]*307joint promissory note should be joined in an action against the survivor. Ye do not think such joinder is required.

Chandler § Hynes, for the appellant. Jas. H. Blythe, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Ind. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klussman-v-copeland-ind-1862.