Klunk v. U.S. Cost, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1926

CARL KLUNK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

U.S. COST, INCORPORATED; PARSONS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:05-cv-01262-TSE)

Submitted: March 28, 2007 Decided: April 11, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dean E. Wanderer, DEAN E. WANDERER & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Gregory J. Digel, HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Kathleen M. Williams, EPSTEIN, BECKER & GREEN, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carl Klunk appeals the district court’s order dismissing

this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated from the bench by the

district court. Klunk v. U.S. Cost, Inc., No. 1:05-cv-01262-TSE

(E.D. Va. July 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -