Klunder v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp.
Opinion
SuprREME Gourt OF Nevaba
CLERK’S ORDER (0) 1947 GE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SCOTT KLUNDER, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs.
THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION; AND THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR MANUFACTURING, INC., Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL No. 84631 FILED MAY 20 2022
ELIZABETH A BROWN CLERK a aie COURT
BY. DEPUTY CLERK
This appeal was docketed on April 28, 2022, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 7 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court’s notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.
ec: Hon. Crystal Eller, District Judge Ladah Law Firm McKay Law Firm Chtd. Eighth District Court Clerk
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
"a * BY: Sen haw
A2-1woa4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klunder v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp. (Klunder v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.