Kluger v. Mendelsohn

169 A. 691, 112 N.J.L. 96, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 234
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 5, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 169 A. 691 (Kluger v. Mendelsohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kluger v. Mendelsohn, 169 A. 691, 112 N.J.L. 96, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 234 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A. 691, 112 N.J.L. 96, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kluger-v-mendelsohn-nj-1934.