Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Klug v. State

Klug v. State

667 So. 2d 956, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1386, 1996 WL 60512
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1909
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 667 So. 2d 956 (Klug v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klug v. State, 667 So. 2d 956, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1386, 1996 WL 60512 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed and we also find no error preserved for our review with regard to the restitution as ordered. We remand, however, for the deletion of cost awards and the 4% surcharge as being unsupported by authority. See McCray v. State, 665 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st [957]*957DCA 1996); Reyes v. State, 665 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may enter a written order reimposing some or all of these charges so long as specific statutory authority is provided for them.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burch v. State
823 So. 2d 854 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bailey v. State
677 So. 2d 1358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 So. 2d 956, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1386, 1996 WL 60512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klug-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.