Klug v. State
667 So. 2d 956, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1386, 1996 WL 60512
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1996·No. No. 95-1909·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The judgment and sentence are affirmed and we also find no error preserved for our review with regard to the restitution as ordered. We remand, however, for the deletion of cost awards and the 4% surcharge as being unsupported by authority. See McCray v. State, 665 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st [957]*957DCA 1996); Reyes v. State, 665 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may enter a written order reimposing some or all of these charges so long as specific statutory authority is provided for them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klug v. State, 667 So. 2d 956, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1386, 1996 WL 60512 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
667 So. 2d 956 (Klug v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burch v. State
823 So. 2d 854 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bailey v. State
677 So. 2d 1358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)