Klug v. Smith
This text of 388 N.W.2d 515 (Klug v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action involves the ownership of an 11-acre tract of real estate bordering the Missouri River in Cedar County, *203 Nebraska. Defendant-appellant, Alice Mae Shove Hansen, originally filed a partition action in June 1984. Plaintiffsappellees, Reinhold, Gerald, and Donald Klug, filed a separate quiet title action, naming Hansen and other interested parties as defendants. The Cedar County District Court found that the plaintiffs had sufficiently established adverse possession of the property as against their cotenants, Hansen and the others. The court quieted title in the Klugs, and Hansen appeals.
In her appellate brief, Hansen fails to assign errors. We have frequently held that errors not properly assigned will not be considered. Both the rules of this court and prior case law require that each error relied upon for reversal be separately and concisely stated and discussed. Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(l)d (rev. 1983); Lincoln Co. Sheriff’s Emp. Assn. v. Co. of Lincoln, 216 Neb. 274, 343 N.W.2d 735 (1984); State ex rel. Hilt Truck Line v. Jensen, 218 Neb. 591, 357 N.W.2d 455 (1984).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 N.W.2d 515, 223 Neb. 202, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klug-v-smith-neb-1986.