Klug Currency Exchange, Inc. v. State
This text of 34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 54 (Klug Currency Exchange, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of Respondent for summary judgment, due notice having been given to the Claimant, and the Court being fully advised in the premises;
Finds:
1. That Claimant brought this claim for a lost warrant issued on January 18, 1974, in the amount of $196.00 payable to Maria Meza.
2. That said warrant was negotiated by Claimant over one year after it was issued.
3. That the warrant issued was not properly negotiated in that the said warrant was endorsed to Claimant after the time limit within the Comptroller’s Act had expired. That the Claimant does not, therefore, have a cause of action against the State as a matter of law. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 15, pars. 210.07, 210.10.
It is therefore ordered that the motion of Respondent be, and the same is hereby granted, and judgment is hereby entered in favor of Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Ill. Ct. Cl. 54, 1980 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klug-currency-exchange-inc-v-state-ilclaimsct-1980.