Klotz v. Saul

CourtDistrict Court, D. Utah
DecidedAugust 29, 2019
Docket2:17-cv-00453
StatusUnknown

This text of Klotz v. Saul (Klotz v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klotz v. Saul, (D. Utah 2019).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

MARSHA KLOTZ, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:17-cv-453

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Chief Judge Robert J. Shelby Social Security, Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Defendant.

The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B),1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019.2 On August 12, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation.3 Judge Romero recommends denying Plaintiff’s motion to reopen briefing because the arguments Plaintiff wishes to raise are untimely.4 Neither party objects to Judge Romero’s Report and Recommendation, so the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error.5

1 Dkt. 22. 2 Dkt. 33. 3 Dkt. 35. 4 Id. at 2–4. 5 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (citing Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court for N. Dist. of Cal., 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 879). Having carefully considered Judge Romero’s Report and Recommendation, the court finds no clear error. The court therefore ADOPTS Judge Romero’s Report and Recommendation and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion.° SO ORDERED this 28th day of August, 2019. BY THE COURT:

ROBERT AZ United St&es Chief District Judge

® Dkt. 27.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Klotz v. Saul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klotz-v-saul-utd-2019.