Klotz v. Mango

141 A. 164, 6 N.J. Misc. 373, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 314
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 29, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 141 A. 164 (Klotz v. Mango) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klotz v. Mango, 141 A. 164, 6 N.J. Misc. 373, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 314 (N.J. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is plaintiffs rule for new trial, a verdict having been rendered in his favor for one dollar. The action was to recover for injuries to plaintiffs truck, growing out of a collision between the trucks of the plaintiff and the defendant.

The damage to the plaintiff’s truck was substantial and the jury’s finding is without rational explanation.

The rule for new trial is made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. Strain Bros.
92 P.2d 766 (Montana Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 A. 164, 6 N.J. Misc. 373, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klotz-v-mango-nj-1928.