Klotz v. Mango
141 A. 164, 6 N.J. Misc. 373, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 314
Opinion
This is plaintiffs rule for new trial, a verdict having been rendered in his favor for one dollar. The action was to recover for injuries to plaintiffs truck, growing out of a collision between the trucks of the plaintiff and the defendant.
The damage to the plaintiff’s truck was substantial and the jury’s finding is without rational explanation.
The rule for new trial is made absolute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klotz v. Mango, 141 A. 164, 6 N.J. Misc. 373, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 314 (N.J. 1928).
141 A. 164 (Klotz v. Mango) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hicks v. Strain Bros.
92 P.2d 766 (Montana Supreme Court, 1939)