Klotz v. Ganz
70 N.E.2d 538, 296 N.Y. 715, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1275
Opinion
Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the ground that the defendant shared with her tenants occupation and control of the property in question. No opinion.
Concur: Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Fuld, JJ. Loughban, Ch. J., Thacher and Dye, JJ. dissent and vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klotz v. Ganz, 70 N.E.2d 538, 296 N.Y. 715, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1275 (N.Y. 1946).
70 N.E.2d 538 (Klotz v. Ganz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Searles v. Town of Horicon
166 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Joseph Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique
245 F.2d 175 (Second Circuit, 1957)
Boreyko v. Bay Ridge Savings Bank
274 A.D. 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)