Klotz v. El Morocco International, Ltd.
63 Misc. 2d 489, 312 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1007
Opinion
The record clearly establishes the defendant exercised that degree of ordinary care required of a bailee for mutual benefit. Consequently, the subsequent loss by defendant of the vehicle here involved was not occasioned by any negligence on the part of the def endant bailee.
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.
Concur — Streit, Gold and Hoestadter, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klotz v. El Morocco International, Ltd., 63 Misc. 2d 489, 312 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1007 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1968).
63 Misc. 2d 489 (Klotz v. El Morocco International, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.