Klotz v. El Morocco International, Ltd.

New York Supreme Court

Klotz v. El Morocco International, Ltd.

63 Misc. 2d 489, 312 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1007

DecidedDecember 6, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 63 Misc. 2d 489 (Klotz v. El Morocco International, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klotz v. El Morocco International, Ltd., 63 Misc. 2d 489, 312 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1007 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record clearly establishes the defendant exercised that degree of ordinary care required of a bailee for mutual benefit. Consequently, the subsequent loss by defendant of the vehicle here involved was not occasioned by any negligence on the part of the def endant bailee.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

Concur — Streit, Gold and Hoestadter, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record clearly establishes the defendant exercised that degree of ordinary care required of a bailee for mutual benefit. Consequently, the subsequent loss by defendant of the vehicle here involved was not occasioned by any negligence on the part of the def endant bailee.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

Concur — Streit, Gold and Hoestadter, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 Misc. 2d 489, 312 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klotz-v-el-morocco-international-ltd-nysupct-1968.