Klos v. New York City Transit Authority
691 N.E.2d 628, 91 N.Y.2d 885, 668 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 122
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Klos v. New York City Transit Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 N.Y.2d 846 →
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff, having stipulated to a reduction in damages at the Appellate Division, is not a party aggrieved (CPLR 5511; see, Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777, 780, n).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klos v. New York City Transit Authority, 691 N.E.2d 628, 91 N.Y.2d 885, 668 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 122 (N.Y. 1998).
691 N.E.2d 628 (Klos v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitfield v. City of New York
689 N.E.2d 515 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)