Klos v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klos v. Burns

74 A.D.3d 1206, 902 N.Y.S.2d 410

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.3d 1206 (Klos v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klos v. Burns, 74 A.D.3d 1206, 902 N.Y.S.2d 410 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Eisman, J.), dated June 8, 2009, which prohibited the petitioner from filing any petitions seeking an order of protection against the respondent based on the same allegations contained in the petitions that the petitioner previously filed under Family Court docket numbers 0-1127-09, 0-1127-09/09A, and 0-4820-09.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order of the Family Court in a family offense proceeding, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Campbell v Desir, 251 AD2d 402, 403 [1998]). Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Miller and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Eisman, J.), dated June 8, 2009, which prohibited the petitioner from filing any petitions seeking an order of protection against the respondent based on the same allegations contained in the petitions that the petitioner previously filed under Family Court docket numbers 0-1127-09, 0-1127-09/09A, and 0-4820-09.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order of the Family Court in a family offense proceeding, and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Campbell v Desir, 251 AD2d 402, 403 [1998]). Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Miller and Lott, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.3d 1206, 902 N.Y.S.2d 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klos-v-burns-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack