Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Klopp v. Nagel

Klopp v. Nagel

247 So. 2d 476, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6678
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1971·No. No. 70-552·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has failed to furnish this court with those portions of the testimony taken [477] that were relied on in entering the order sought to be reviewed. Insured Lloyds v. James, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 595. Thus, we are powerless to discern or demonstrate error.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and REED, JJ., and DOWN-EY, JAMES C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klopp v. Nagel, 247 So. 2d 476, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

247 So. 2d 476 (Klopp v. Nagel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Insured Lloyds v. James
200 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)