Klopfle v. New York State Thruway Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klopfle v. New York State Thruway Authority

172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6433

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D.2d 1073 (Klopfle v. New York State Thruway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klopfle v. New York State Thruway Authority, 172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to strike attachments from defendant’s brief granted to the extent that the transcript of oral argument on the motion be deemed deleted. Memorandum: It is improper to include in defendant’s brief on appeal a copy of the transcript of oral argument on the motion because that transcript was not included in the stipulated record on appeal. Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to strike attachments from defendant’s brief granted to the extent that the transcript of oral argument on the motion be deemed deleted. Memorandum: It is improper to include in defendant’s brief on appeal a copy of the transcript of oral argument on the motion because that transcript was not included in the stipulated record on appeal. Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klopfle-v-new-york-state-thruway-authority-nyappdiv-1991.