Klopfle v. New York State Thruway Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klopfle v. New York State Thruway Authority

172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6433

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1991·Published

Opinion

Motion to strike attachments from defendant’s brief granted to the extent that the transcript of oral argument on the motion be deemed deleted. Memorandum: It is improper to include in defendant’s brief on appeal a copy of the transcript of oral argument on the motion because that transcript was not included in the stipulated record on appeal. Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to strike attachments from defendant’s brief granted to the extent that the transcript of oral argument on the motion be deemed deleted. Memorandum: It is improper to include in defendant’s brief on appeal a copy of the transcript of oral argument on the motion because that transcript was not included in the stipulated record on appeal. Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Klopfle v. New York State Thruway Authority, 172 A.D.2d 1073, 571 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

172 A.D.2d 1073 (Klopfle v. New York State Thruway Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.