Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Klopfenstein v. State

Klopfenstein v. State

787 So. 2d 980, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9511, 2001 WL 770402
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 11, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-4429
StatusPublished

This text of 787 So. 2d 980 (Klopfenstein v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klopfenstein v. State, 787 So. 2d 980, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9511, 2001 WL 770402 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Klopfenstein may file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion pursuant to Sidell v. State, 787 So.2d 139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), and it shall not be considered successive by the trial court.

BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sidell v. State
787 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 980, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9511, 2001 WL 770402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klopfenstein-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.