Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Klopfenstein v. State

Klopfenstein v. State

787 So. 2d 980, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9511, 2001 WL 770402
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 2001·No. No. 2D00-4429·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Klopfenstein may file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion pursuant to Sidell v. State, 787 So.2d 139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), and it shall not be considered successive by the trial court.

BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klopfenstein v. State, 787 So. 2d 980, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9511, 2001 WL 770402 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

787 So. 2d 980 (Klopfenstein v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sidell v. State
787 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)