Klipstein v. United States
This text of 91 F. 520 (Klipstein v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By paragraph 14 of the act of 1894, coal-tar colors or dyes, by whatever name known, are dutiable at 25 per cent.; and, by paragraph 368, alizarin, and alizarin colors or dyes, natural or artificial, are free. This merchandise appears to have been entered for duty as an alizarin color, and to have been returned by the appraiser as a coal-tar color. Duties were assessed upon it according to the return, notwithstanding a protest that it was free under paragraph 368. On appeal, one of the importers testified that he was told it was an alizarin color, but on cross-examination he said in fact it was a color or dye, although used with a mordant, and was a product of coal tar; that it takes the place of gallocyanine, which is defined as a coal-tar color, and is a faster product. On this evidence, the board could well find that it was a coal-tar color or dye, although that it is used with a mordant might raise a doubt whether it was not an alizarin. There has been, however, further evidence taken, upon which the finding is changed. Decision reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 F. 520, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klipstein-v-united-states-circtsdny-1899.