Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railway Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railway Co.

59 N.Y. St. Rep. 573

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedMay 7, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 573 (Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railway Co., 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 573 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Duglio, J.

The only question on this appeal is whether it was ■error to refuse a jury trial of the question of past damages, these damages having been obtained by the plaintiff through assignment. The principles stated in the cases of Shepard v. Man. Railway Co., 117 N. Y. 442 ; 27 St. Rep. 705, and Hunter v. Same, 57 St. Rep. 400, when applied to the question, necessarily lead to an affirmance.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

V

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duglio, J.

The only question on this appeal is whether it was ■error to refuse a jury trial of the question of past damages, these damages having been obtained by the plaintiff through assignment. The principles stated in the cases of Shepard v. Man. Railway Co., 117 N. Y. 442 ; 27 St. Rep. 705, and Hunter v. Same, 57 St. Rep. 400, when applied to the question, necessarily lead to an affirmance.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

V

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 N.Y. St. Rep. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klipstein-v-new-york-elevated-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack