Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railway Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railway Co.

59 N.Y. St. Rep. 573

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 7, 1894·Published

Opinion

Duglio, J.

The only question on this appeal is whether it was ■error to refuse a jury trial of the question of past damages, these damages having been obtained by the plaintiff through assignment. The principles stated in the cases of Shepard v. Man. Railway Co., 117 N. Y. 442 ; 27 St. Rep. 705, and Hunter v. Same, 57 St. Rep. 400, when applied to the question, necessarily lead to an affirmance.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

V

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duglio, J.

The only question on this appeal is whether it was ■error to refuse a jury trial of the question of past damages, these damages having been obtained by the plaintiff through assignment. The principles stated in the cases of Shepard v. Man. Railway Co., 117 N. Y. 442 ; 27 St. Rep. 705, and Hunter v. Same, 57 St. Rep. 400, when applied to the question, necessarily lead to an affirmance.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

V

Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railway Co., 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 573 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

59 N.Y. St. Rep. 573 (Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related