Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railroad

9 Misc. 708, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, 29 N.Y.S. 1145, 1894 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 818
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJuly 1, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Misc. 708 (Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railroad, 9 Misc. 708, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, 29 N.Y.S. 1145, 1894 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 818 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the respondent by stipulation consents to deduct from the judgment the sum allowed by the jury for interest and the interest, if any, computed upon such sum from the time of the rendition of the verdict.

[709]*709If such stipulation be given and reduction made, the judgment and order should be affirmed, without costs upon this appeal.

Present: Freedman and McAdam, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless respondent stipulates to reduce the judgment, in' which event judgment as modified affirmed, without costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Misc. 708, 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, 29 N.Y.S. 1145, 1894 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klipstein-v-new-york-elevated-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1894.