Klippel v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.

244 A.D. 728

This text of 244 A.D. 728 (Klippel v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klippel v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., 244 A.D. 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while a passenger in one of defendant’s amusement cars upon its scenic railway in Coney Island. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of the case affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from the denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial and from the order dismissing her complaint dismissed. The order dismissing the complaint is not contained in the record. An appeal does not lie from the mere denial of a motion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klippel-v-steeplechase-amusement-co-nyappdiv-1935.