Klink v. Szalkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klink v. Szalkowski

257 A.D. 914, 12 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8380

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 1939·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied, with leave to renew. Memorandum: The papers before us faü to show merits inasmuch as the motion, on which the order appealed from was granted, was to vacate an order of dismissal and to restore the case to the calendar thus being substantiaEy a motion for a rehearing from which an independent appeal does not He. Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person denied, with leave to renew. Memorandum: The papers before us faü to show merits inasmuch as the motion, on which the order appealed from was granted, was to vacate an order of dismissal and to restore the case to the calendar thus being substantiaEy a motion for a rehearing from which an independent appeal does not He. Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Klink v. Szalkowski, 257 A.D. 914, 12 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 914 (Klink v. Szalkowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.